Get Help Today! | 978.474.8670
If you have been injured in a motorcycle accident and have also been through a car accident claim before, you may have noticed that the process feels different. That is because it is. Massachusetts law treats motorcycle accident claims differently from car accident claims in several important ways, and those differences affect what coverage is available to you immediately after the crash, whether you can file a lawsuit, how fault is argued, and what your claim is ultimately worth.
This article breaks down those differences clearly and directly so that injured riders understand what they are dealing with — and what to watch out for.
Kiley Law Group has represented injured motorcyclists across Massachusetts and New Hampshire for more than 50 years and has recovered over $1 billion for our clients. If you were hurt in a motorcycle accident, call 978-474-8670 for a free consultation.
Difference 1: PIP Coverage Does Not Apply to Motorcyclists
This is the most immediate and consequential difference after a crash. Under Massachusetts law (M.G.L. c. 90, §34M), car drivers are entitled to Personal Injury Protection coverage, commonly called PIP. PIP is a no-fault benefit that pays up to $8,000 for medical expenses and 75% of lost wages regardless of who caused the accident. A car driver can access those funds quickly, before fault is even determined.
Motorcyclists are specifically excluded from PIP under 211 CMR 3.02. This applies to both the rider and any passenger on the bike. You cannot draw on a household car policy's PIP coverage for injuries suffered while riding a motorcycle.
In practice, this means that after a motorcycle crash, you are likely looking at your personal health insurance as your first source of medical cost coverage. Some riders purchase optional Medical Payments coverage, known as MedPay, on their motorcycle policy. MedPay functions similarly to PIP in that it pays medical bills regardless of fault, but it does not include the lost wage component, and limits are typically lower than the $8,000 PIP maximum. Without either, out-of-pocket costs start mounting immediately while your claim against the at-fault driver is still being built.
Difference 2: Motorcyclists Are Not Subject to the Lawsuit Threshold
Because Massachusetts uses a modified no-fault system for car accidents, car drivers face restrictions on when they can sue for pain and suffering. Under M.G.L. c. 90, §34M, a car accident victim must meet a legal threshold before they can pursue a tort claim for non-economic damages. They must show either that their reasonable medical expenses exceeded $2,000, or that they suffered a fracture, serious disfigurement, or substantial loss of hearing or sight.
That threshold does not apply to motorcyclists. Because motorcyclists are excluded from the PIP no-fault system, they are also not subject to the same restrictions on filing a lawsuit. A rider injured by another driver's negligence can pursue a personal injury claim regardless of whether their medical bills reached any dollar threshold.
This is one of the few ways in which the legal framework is more favorable for motorcyclists than for car accident victims. A rider with a legitimate injury that might not meet the $2,000 threshold in a car accident context still has a viable claim. Knowing this matters, because insurance adjusters will not volunteer the information.
Difference 3: The Insurance Structure Is Different
Minimum Coverage Requirements
As of July 1, 2025, Massachusetts raised its minimum mandatory auto insurance limits for the first time since 1988 under House Bill H.5111, signed by Governor Healey in December 2024. The new minimums for policies issued or renewed on or after July 1, 2025 are $25,000 per person and $50,000 per accident for bodily injury liability, $30,000 per accident for property damage, and $25,000 per person and $50,000 per accident for uninsured motorist coverage. PIP remains at $8,000 per person.
Both car drivers and motorcyclists are subject to these same bodily injury liability and uninsured motorist minimums. However, because PIP is excluded from motorcycle policies and motorcyclists are outside the no-fault system, a rider may have significantly less first-party coverage available immediately after a crash than a car driver in the same accident.
MedPay as a Partial Substitute
Some motorcyclists purchase MedPay coverage to partially offset the absence of PIP. MedPay covers medical bills for the rider and any passenger regardless of fault, up to the purchased limit. It does not replace the lost wage benefit that PIP provides to car drivers, but it at least creates some immediate financial cushion for medical costs. Riders who do not carry MedPay and do not have strong health insurance coverage are exposed from the first day after a crash.
Uninsured and Underinsured Motorist Coverage
Uninsured motorist coverage is mandatory on motorcycle policies in Massachusetts at the new $25,000/$50,000 minimums. Underinsured motorist coverage is optional on both car and motorcycle policies. As covered in the Uninsured and Underinsured Motorist article in this series, stacking of UM/UIM coverage across multiple policies is expressly prohibited by statute under M.G.L. c. 175, §113L(5). This applies to motorcycle policies as it does to car policies, making it especially important for riders to carry high individual policy limits rather than relying on supplemental coverage from other vehicles they own.
Difference 4: Fault Is Argued More Aggressively Against Motorcyclists
Both car and motorcycle accident claims are subject to Massachusetts modified comparative negligence under M.G.L. c. 231, §85. If you are found to be more than 50% at fault for an accident, you cannot recover anything. If you are partially at fault, your compensation is reduced by your fault percentage.
In car accident claims, fault disputes tend to focus on specific driving conduct: who had the right of way, who was speeding, who failed to signal. In motorcycle accident claims, insurers often pursue a much broader attack. Adjusters frequently allege that the rider was speeding, weaving through traffic, riding recklessly, or engaging in lane splitting, which is illegal in Massachusetts under M.G.L. c. 89, §4A. Some adjusters and jurors treat the act of riding a motorcycle as inherently risk-taking behavior that justifies assigning a higher fault percentage to the rider regardless of the specific facts.
This pattern is well recognized in motorcycle accident litigation. It has to be actively countered with strong evidence, including police reports, witness statements, accident reconstruction, and documentation of the other driver's conduct. A rider who accepts an adjuster's fault assessment without pushback often receives far less than they are owed.
Difference 5: Helmet Law Creates a Fault Issue That Does Not Exist in Car Cases
Massachusetts requires all motorcycle riders and passengers to wear DOT-approved helmets at all times under M.G.L. c. 90, §7. There is no equivalent equipment requirement for car occupants.
If a motorcyclist was not wearing a helmet and suffers head or brain injuries, the at-fault driver's insurer will almost certainly argue that the injuries would have been less severe with proper gear. Under comparative negligence, this argument can reduce the rider's recovery even when the other driver was clearly at fault for causing the crash. The helmet violation becomes a weapon in the insurer's fault argument.
A similar dynamic can arise with other protective gear, though Massachusetts does not legally mandate anything beyond the helmet and required eye protection. Insurers may still argue that a rider who crashed without protective clothing contributed to the severity of their own road rash or soft tissue injuries. This means that what a rider was wearing at the time of the crash is part of the claim analysis in a way that simply does not exist in car accident cases.
Difference 6: Injuries Are More Severe and Claims Are Worth More
Motorcycle accident claims tend to be worth more than car accident claims involving the same crash scenario. The physical reason is straightforward: a motorcycle provides no steel frame, no airbags, and no seatbelt. A collision that produces whiplash in a car can produce fractures, traumatic brain injury, or spinal cord damage on a motorcycle. The rider absorbs the full force of the impact.
More severe injuries produce higher medical bills, longer recovery periods, greater lost earning capacity, and larger pain and suffering components. The Motorcycle Accident Settlements article in this series covers the general settlement ranges in detail. The point here is that the higher potential value of a motorcycle claim is exactly why insurers argue fault and comparative negligence so aggressively. They are trying to reduce a larger payout, not a smaller one.
The absence of a steel frame also means that even low-speed motorcycle accidents can produce serious injuries. A relatively minor impact that would leave a car driver shaken but uninjured can break bones, cause road rash requiring skin grafts, or result in a concussion for a rider. The severity of injury does not scale with speed the same way it does in car crashes.
Difference 7: The Claims Process Starts Differently
After a Car Accident
After a car accident in Massachusetts, the immediate process typically begins with a PIP claim against the driver's own insurer. Medical bills and a portion of lost wages are paid by your own insurance while fault is being determined on the other side. This no-fault buffer gives car accident victims some financial stability in the weeks and months after a crash.
After a Motorcycle Accident
After a motorcycle accident, there is no PIP buffer. The financial pressure begins immediately. The only first-party coverage available is MedPay if the rider purchased it, or personal health insurance for medical costs — with no automatic lost wage component at all. The claim against the at-fault driver must be built and pursued from the start, without a cushion absorbing the early costs.
This pressure is something insurance companies understand and exploit. An insurer for the at-fault driver may offer a quick settlement while the rider is still injured and facing mounting bills. Accepting an early offer before the full extent of injuries is known — before reaching maximum medical improvement — often results in settling for far less than the claim is worth. Future medical costs, long-term rehabilitation, and lost earning capacity are not properly accounted for in early offers.
An attorney experienced in motorcycle accident claims knows to document all injuries fully, engage medical experts where appropriate, and hold off on settlement discussions until the complete picture is clear.
What This Means If You Were Injured
The differences between motorcycle and car accident claims compound in ways that make motorcycle cases both more complex and more consequential than car accident claims. To summarize what injured riders are actually dealing with:
Insurance companies that handle motorcycle claims regularly know all of these dynamics. They count on riders not knowing them. An attorney with specific experience in Massachusetts motorcycle accident claims understands the landscape equally well and can level that imbalance.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I file a personal injury lawsuit after a motorcycle accident in Massachusetts?
Yes. Because motorcyclists are outside the no-fault PIP system, you are not subject to the $2,000 medical expense threshold that car accident victims must meet before suing for pain and suffering. If another driver's negligence caused your injuries, you can pursue a claim against that driver regardless of the dollar amount of your medical bills.
Why does not having PIP matter so much after a motorcycle crash?
PIP gives car accident victims an immediate, no-fault source of payment for medical bills and partial lost wages while the claim is being resolved. Motorcyclists have no equivalent automatic benefit. Health insurance can cover some medical costs, and MedPay can help if you purchased it, but neither covers lost wages the way PIP does. The gap can be significant in the weeks and months following a serious injury.
What are the current minimum insurance requirements in Massachusetts?
As of July 1, 2025, Massachusetts requires minimum bodily injury liability coverage of $25,000 per person and $50,000 per accident, minimum property damage coverage of $30,000 per accident, and minimum uninsured motorist coverage of $25,000 per person and $50,000 per accident. PIP remains at $8,000 per person for car drivers. These minimums apply to both auto and motorcycle policies for the coverages that motorcycles are required to carry.
Will not wearing a helmet reduce my recovery after a motorcycle accident?
It can. If you were not wearing the legally required DOT-approved helmet and you suffered head or brain injuries, the at-fault driver's insurer will argue that your injuries were made worse by your failure to comply with the law. Under Massachusetts comparative negligence rules, this argument can reduce your recovery even though the other driver caused the accident. Tell your attorney immediately whether you were wearing a helmet so they can anticipate and address the argument.
Are motorcycle accident settlements higher than car accident settlements in Massachusetts?
Generally yes, for comparable crashes, because motorcycle injuries tend to be significantly more severe. The absence of vehicle protection means riders absorb far more force, producing more serious and more expensive injuries. However, higher potential value does not translate to easier or higher automatic offers from insurers. Motorcycle claims are contested more aggressively, not less, and realizing their full value requires effective legal representation.
What is the statute of limitations for a motorcycle accident claim in Massachusetts?
The standard personal injury statute of limitations is three years from the date of the accident under M.G.L. c. 260, §2A. This is the same deadline that applies to car accident claims. If you are also pursuing a UM/UIM claim against your own insurer, those contract claims carry a six-year limitations period, but your specific policy may impose shorter internal notice and filing deadlines. Missing any of these deadlines can permanently bar your claim.
Injured in a Motorcycle Accident? Talk to Kiley Law Group.
The legal and insurance differences between motorcycle and car accident claims are not small technicalities. They affect whether you can sue, how much pressure you face immediately after the crash, how aggressively fault is argued against you, and how much your case is ultimately worth. Kiley Law Group has represented injured motorcyclists across Massachusetts and New Hampshire for more than 50 years and has recovered over $1 billion for our clients. We handle motorcycle accident cases on a contingency basis — you pay nothing unless we win.
Call 978-474-8670 today for a free consultation, or contact us online.
This page is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Massachusetts law cited includes M.G.L. c. 90, §34M (PIP/no-fault); M.G.L. c. 90, §7 (helmet law); M.G.L. c. 89, §4A (lane usage); M.G.L. c. 175, §113L(5) (anti-stacking); M.G.L. c. 231, §85 (comparative negligence); M.G.L. c. 260, §2A (statute of limitations); 211 CMR 3.02 (motorcycle PIP exemption); and House Bill H.5111 / Ch. 275 of the Acts of 2024 (2025 minimum coverage increases). Laws change; consult a licensed Massachusetts attorney for advice specific to your situation.
